High Court dismissed three arbitration appeals because the appellant's counsel submitted that the appellant company was wound up, closed, and had no further instructions.
Arbitration appeals ARB A 04-06 of 2007 dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Arbitration Appeal No. 04 of 2007
M/s Gouranga Lal Chatterjee
… …. Appellant
Versus
with
Arbitration Appeal No. 05 of 2007
M/s Gouranga Lal Chatterjee
Appellant
Versus
with
Arbitration Appeal No. 06 of 2007
M/s Gouranga Lal Chatterjee
Appellant
Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Appellant : M/s Sumir Prasad & Jay Shankar Tiwary, Advocates For the Respondents : Ms. Shivani Kapoor, A.C. to S.C.-II
Oral Order
15 / Dated : 01.12.2022
It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant-
Company has winded up and has been closed and he has no instruction from his client.
Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed as not pressed at this stage.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J . )
AKT
M/s Gouranga Lal Chatterjee
The State of Bihar (now State of Jharkhand) through Chief Engineer
The Executive Engineer. Bihar Plateau Development Project
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
