Petitioners submitted that the underlying trial court had already decided the matter, rendering the writ petition infructuous. The Court dismissed the petition on that ground.
Instant CMP dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C. M. P. No.89 of 2020
1.Mahamati Murmu 2.Sushil Tudu 3.Soelen Tudu 4.Bren Tudu .... .. ... Petitioner(s) Versus Sonamani Murmu & Ors. .. ... ...Opp. Party(s)
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party (s) :
05/ 14.11.2022 . It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the matter has become infructuous as the learned Trial court has proceeded and decided the matter. Accordingly, the instant CMP stands dismissed, as infructuous.
( Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J. )
Sandeep/
Mahamati Murmu & Ors.
Sonamani Murmu & Ors.
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
