Allowed

Jitendra Kumar Shivam v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC16 Nov 2022A.B.A./8663/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand allowed an anticipatory bail application. The petitioner, owner of a truck seized with stone chips, was granted bail upon arrest or surrender within two weeks upon deposit of security and furnishing a bail bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon arrest or surrender within two weeks, subject to security deposit, bail bond, and sureties.

Jitendra Kumar Shivam Vs the State of Jharkhand — Mining and Natural Resources | Jharkhand HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 8663 of 2022

¶2

Jitendra Kumar Shivam. .... .. ... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand. .. ... ...Opp. Party(s) ...........

¶3

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶4

For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, APP

¶5

04/ 16.11.2022 . Apprehending his arrest, petitioner above-named has moved this Court

¶6

for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Ranga P.S. Case No.79 of 2022 registered under Sections 175 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 21/ 21(6) of the MMDR Act, 1957 and Rule 4/ 54 of the Jharkhand Mines Minerals Concession Rules, 2004 and Rule 7 /9 of the Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining) Transportation and Storage Rule, 2017.

¶7

Heard the parties.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is the owner of Truck bearing Registration No.JH04X- 4380 which was allegedly seized with 850 CFT stone chips without having any valid document.

¶9

It is further submitted that the petitioner has got no concern with the seized materials.

¶10

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer.

¶11

Considering the submissions of learned counsel and the fact as discussed above, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of two weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner named above shall be released on bail on Security Deposit of Rs.25,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶12

The petitioner will co-operate in the investigation and will appear on notice under Section 41 A of Cr.P.C. and comply with the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶13

( Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J. )

¶14

Sandeep/

Jitendra Kumar Shivam v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Kumar Shivam v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahamati Murmu Vs Sonamani Murmu

Chandra Bhushan Singh Vs Annpurna Devi

Josphine Kachhap Vs the Khunti Ursuline Society Trustee

Swami Nandan Singh Vs Priya Singh Alias Priya Bhardwaj

Pramod Kumar Agrawal Vs State of Jharkhand through Superintendent of Police Anti Corruption Bureau Hazaribagh

Sanjay Choudhary Vs the State of Jharkhand