Allowed

Shareef Sheikh Alias Sarif Sk v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC19 Oct 2022A.B.A./5101/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners facing charges of theft and criminal breach of trust in a coal transportation case, subject to conditions including surrender within four weeks, provision of sureties, and cooperation with the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail subject to surrender within four weeks, bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, cooperation with investigation, and furnishing contact details under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Shareef Sheikh Alias Sarif Sk Vs the State of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.5101 of 2022

¶2

------

¶3

Shareef Sheikh @ Sarif Sk

¶4

Rabiul Sheikh @ Robiul Sk.

¶5

------

¶6

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

¶7

-----For the Petitioners : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl.P.P

¶8

------

¶9

Order No.03 Dated- 19.10.2022

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

Apprehending their arrest in connection with Pakur(Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 83 of 2022 instituted under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶12

It is alleged that petitioner no.1 is owner of the tractor bearing Chasis No.MBNAAAVAPJRM00487 and petitioner no.2 is the owner of the seized trailer bearing Reg. No.JH-17R-8657 which were found indulged in transportation of stolen coal.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of petitioners and they have no concern with the seized coal. Petitioners have been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of apprehended coaccused person. Petitioners have no criminal antecedents. Petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case. Hence, petitioners may be extended the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶14

Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of allegation against petitioners coupled with materials available on record, I am inclined to extend privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court within four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Pakur in connection with Pakur(Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 83 of 2022 with the condition that

¶16

they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶17

(Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.)

¶18

Pappu/

Shareef Sheikh Alias Sarif Sk v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shareef Sheikh Alias Sarif Sk v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagendra Prasad Saini Vs the State of Jharkhand

Saurav Saini Alias Kumar Saurav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Lalu Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Sirajul Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sonu Ansari Alias Safiullah Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ravindra Nath Sen Vs the State of Jharkhand