An anticipatory bail application filed by two petitioners was dismissed as withdrawn because the listing note indicated they were already in arrest, rendering the application infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4947 of 2022
.... … Petitioners Versus
The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opp. Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND
-------For the Petitioners : None For the State : None --------
03/ 01.08.2022 This case has been listed by mentioning slip under the heading “for orders
(withdrawal of cases)” in which it is mentioned that the petitioners/applicants are arrested.
As such this anticipatory bail has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Subhash Chand, J.)
P.K.S.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail application should be dismissed as the applicants were found to be under arrest.
Nagar Chandra Mandal
Mahaprasad Yadav
The State of Jharkhand
Subhash Chand
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
