An anticipatory bail application became infructuous as the petitioner had voluntarily surrendered in custody prior to the hearing. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn without substantive engagement with the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4454 of 2022
Tohid Rai @ Tohid Ray .... … Petitioner Versus
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH CHAND
-------For the Petitioner : None For the State : None --------
03/ 01.08.2022 This case has been listed by mentioning slip under the heading for “orders (withdrawal of cases)” in which it is mentioned that the petitioner/applicant has voluntarily surrendered before the learned court-below on 27.07.2022 and the petitioner/applicant has been remanded to judicial custody. As such this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Subhash Chand, J.)
P.K.S.
Tohid Rai @ Tohid Ray
The State of Jharkhand
Rumi Perween @ Khushboo
SUBHASH CHAND
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
