MD Rustam v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the second bail application of Md. Rustam in a child sexual offence case, citing no new grounds under Section 35 of the POCSO Act despite the trial court's existing direction to conclude the trial within one year.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for bail refused; Trial Court directed to conclude the trial within three months of receipt of this order.