The Coadjutr Justice permitted the petitioner, who had been arrested, to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw anticipatory bail application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.437 of 2022
------
Md. Jan Ansari
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand and Anr. .... .... ....Opposite Parties
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. L.C. Nath Shahedeo, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Addl.P.P
Order No.02 Dated- 04.02.2022
Heard the parties through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner has been arrested, hence, he seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
Permission is accorded.
This anticipatory bail application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Pappu/
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Md. Jan Ansari
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
