Balkaran Yadav Alias Aman Babu Vs the State of Jharkhand

The petitioner, who is an accused for the offence punishable under Sections 392 IPC and later on Section 412 IPC has been added, is praying for grant of regular bail as he is in custody since 18.12.2021.

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the parties and I have gone through the entire record including the impugned order.

¶13

FIR has been registered against unknown person. There is an allegation that some unknown accused person committed road robbery. The name of this petitioner surfaced during course of investigation and it is alleged that accused person has been identified in CCTV footage.

¶14

During course of argument, learned APP submits that petitioner was put on TIP but he was not identified. This submission was made on the instruction of Nodal Officer, Dhanbad.

¶15

Considering the fact that petitioner was not identified in the TIP, I am inclined to allow this application. Accordingly, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Barwadda Police Station Case No. 6 of 2022.

¶16

(ANANDA SEN , J)

¶17

anjali/ C.P 3

Balkaran Yadav Alias Aman Babu v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Balkaran Yadav Alias Aman Babu v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pramod Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Anil Tana Bhagat Alias Anil Bhagat Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rakesh Ganjhu Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Suhail Khan Alias Suhail Khan Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sumit Kumar Jha Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sujit Verma Sujeet Kumar Verma Vs the State of Jharkhand