In this highly summary order, the High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the writ petition as infructuous at the hearing without recording substantive reasons or discussing the legal merits.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6273 of 2017
M/s Vinod Kumar Jain, a registered partnership firm, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh through its partner Vinod Kumar Jain … Petitioner Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Satyam Parmar, AC to Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate For the Respondents : -----
Mr. Satyam Parmar, AC to Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the present writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, the same may accordingly be disposed of.
In view of the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
Manish
M/s Vinod Kumar Jain
The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi
The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi
The Chief Engineer (C), Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi
The Executive Engineer, Road Division, Road Construction Department, Gumla
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
