Petition under Articles 226/227 seeking quashment of superannuation notice. Petitioner sought withdrawal; court allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach respondent, reserving representation for future disposal.
Writ application dismissed with liberty to approach respondent and liberty to file representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 5058 of 2009
Madhu Bouri ..… Petitioner
Versus Central Coalfields Limited & Ors. ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A.K. Das, Advocate ---------
07/ 01.02.2021 Heard through V.C.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Pramanik/
Madhu Bouri
Central Coalfields Limited & Ors.
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
