Disposed

Madhu Singh v. State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC16 Dec 2021WPC/4219/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition seeks regularization of petitioners working in the post of Lady Supervisor since 2008. The Court treated the petition as a representation and directed the respondents to consider their cases through a reasoned order after hearing.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition treated as representation; direction to respondents to pass reasoned order after hearing within twelve weeks.

Madhu Singh Vs State of Jharkhand — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

W.P.(S). No. 4219 of 2021

¶3

¶4

Madhu Singh

¶5

Munni Kumari

¶6

Kumari Sumitra

¶7

Mukti Kumari

¶8

Rita Kumari

¶9

Kuntal Rani

¶10

Kumari Chetna

¶11

Sandhya Sinha

¶12

Pushpa Singh

¶13

Priyanka Kumari

¶14

Minu Kumari

¶15

Sushma Kumari

¶16

Pratima Kachhap

¶17

Nitu Singh

¶18

Kachan Kumari

¶19

Poonam Lakra

¶20

Damyanti Priynvada

¶21

Nutan Kumari

¶22

Kumari Renulata

¶23

Shalini Kumari

¶24

Namita Kumari Munda

¶25

Sarita Kumari

¶26

Rekha Kumari

¶27

Sandhya Kumari

¶28

Lalita Kumari

¶29

Kanti Kumari

¶30

Sushma Gupta

¶31

Soni Gupta

¶32

Renu Kumari 30. Sanyukta Kumari Devi 31. Asha Kumari … … … Petitioners

¶33

Versus

¶34

State of Jharkhand.

¶35

The Secretary, Home, Women Child Development and Social Welfare Department, Government of Jharkhand having office at Project Building, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagganathpur, District-Ranchi.

¶36

The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms & Rajbhasha, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi.

¶37

The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, P.O., P.S. & District-Bokaro.

¶38

The District Social Welfare Officer, Bokaro, P.O., P.S. & District-Bokaro. … ... …. Respondents

¶39

----------- CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N.PATHAK

¶40

----------For Petitioners : Mr. R. K. Gupta, Advocate For Resps.-State : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, GA-II -----------

¶41

¶42

04/ 16.12.2021 Heard the parties.

¶43

Petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer for direction upon the respondents to consider the cases of the present petitioners for their regularization to the post of Lady Supervisor, as they are working against the sanctioned and vacant post since 2008.

¶44

At the very out set learned counsel for the petitioners submits that suffice it would be if this writ petition is treated as representation of the petitioners and directions is given to the respondents to pass a reasoned order on the representation of the petitioners.

¶45

Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to it.

¶46

In view of the fair submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, let this writ petition be treated as representation of the petitioners and further, the petitioners are free to annex any other documents upon which they are relying, other than what has been annexed in the present writ petition, after receipt of the document and the representation of the petitioners, the respondents shall consider the case of petitioners in view of the Annexure-6 dated 13.11.2020, after providing ample opportunity of hearing to him and thereafter, pass a reasoned order, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of the representation of the petitioners.

¶47

With these observations and directions, this writ petition stands

¶48

disposed of.

¶49

Let it be made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits

¶50

of the case.

¶51

(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)

¶52

kunal/-

Madhu Singh v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhu Singh v. State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

MD Nayeem Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bhudeo Prasad Pandit And Anr. Vs Personnel And Adminis Reform

Lal Babu Sharma Vs Personnel And Adminis Reform

Raj Kumar Ram Vs State of Jharkhand

Bamshankar Sharma Vs State of Jharkhand

Laxaminia Devi Vs the Bharat Coking Coal Limited