Disposed

Ashit Chakraborty v. the State of Jharkhand and Anr.

Jharkhand HC17 Mar 2021WPC/3224/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition under Article 226 sought direction to the Certificate Officer under Section 9 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914. The High Court disposed of the petition directing the officer to decide the Section 9 petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file objection under Section 9 of the Act for decision by Certificate Officer.

Ashit Chakraborty Vs the State of Jharkhand and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

W.P.(C) No.3224 of 2013

¶3

Ashit Chakraborty s/o-Late. S.P. Chakroborty, R/o-Siddharth Apartment, Flat no.2/B, IInd Floor, Haludbani, Main Road, P.O.Tatanagar, P.S.-Parsudih, Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand.

¶6

Certificate Officer, Dhalbhum, P.O. and P.S. Dhalbhum, Jamshedpur, Dist.-East Singhbum.

¶7

UCO Bank, Jugsalai Branch, at Jugsalai, P.O. & P.S. Jugsalai, Jamshedpur, Dist.-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.

¶8

…… Respondents

¶9

¶10

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

¶11

¶12

For the Petitioner : Ms. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate For the Respondents : Ms. Shivani Kapoor, AC to SC-II

¶13

¶14

08 / Dated 17^th March, 2021

¶15

The matter has been listed to be heard through video conferencing.

¶16

This writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India whereby and whereunder direction has been sought for upon the respondents No.2 to hear the petition filed under Section 9 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914 as also for quashing the order dated 10.05.2013 passed in C.C. No.67/BL/12-13 by which warrant has been ordered to be issued against the petitioner without resorting to the provision of law contained in Section 10 of the Act, 1914.

¶17

Mr. Soumitra Baroi, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of directing the Certificate Officer to decide the Section 9 petition, if not already decided.

¶18

Ms. Shivani Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondent-State has expressed no objection to such submission made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶19

This Court, having heard the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the prayer made in the writ petition to the effect for directing the Certificate Officer to decide the objection filed by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Act, 1914, deems it fit and proper to dispose of the writ petition directing the Certificate Officer to decide the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 9 of the Act, 1914 in accordance with the law, if not already decided.

¶20

Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.

¶21

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

¶22

Saurabh

Ashit Chakraborty v. the State of Jharkhand and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashit Chakraborty v. the State of Jharkhand and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Green Ray International Limited Represented by Its General Manager Sk Nurul Hossain Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rajesh Kumar Verma Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary

Jharkhand Laghu Ewam Madhyam Samachar Patra Sangh Through Its Convenor Arun Kumar Choudhary Vs The State Of Jharkhand And Ors.

Ramdhani Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary

Inter Silli College through Its Lecturer Harish Chandra Mahto Vs the State of Jharkhand

Alok Kedia Vs Transport