Writ application was filed by the petitioner. The petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the grievance was already redressed and the application was not pressed. The Court dismissed the application accordingly.
Application dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.2879 of 2009
Amar Singh
..… Petitioner
Versus
….. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ashish Kumar, A.C. to S.C. Mines (III)
05/11.02.2021 Heard counsel for the parties through V.C.
2. Mr. Anjani Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner as raised in the instant writ application has already been redressed, as such he does not want to press this application. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent State does not have any objection to the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. In this view of the matter, the instant application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
sm/
Amar Singh
The State of Jharkhand through the Director General of Police, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
