Petitioner in writ petition sought permission to withdraw the case; respondent State raised no objection; single judge allowed withdrawal under Article 226.
Permission to withdraw the writ application granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 2861 of 2009
-------Ramesh Kumar ..… Petitioner
Versus
….. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioner : Ms. Shail Lakra, J.C. to Saurav Shekhar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Manish Mishra, Advocate
05/11.02.2021 Heard counsel for the parties through V.C.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instruction from her client, seeks permission to withdraw this case.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent State does not have any objection.
4. In view of limited submission of the parties, the instant writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
sm/
Ramesh Kumar
State of Jharkhand
DEEPAK ROSHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
