The High Court of Jharkhand, upon an instruction that payment for the work in question was made during pendency, held there was no need to proceed further and disposed of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 2858 of 2020
M/s Royal Shree Enterprises, Chaibasa through its proprietor, Sri Sushant Roy … … Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sanjay Sah, AC to AAG-IV
-----
Mr. Abhishek Kumar Dubey, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, due payment in relation to the work in question has been made to the petitioner.
In view of the said submission, there is no need to further proceed in the writ petition.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Manish
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
M/s Royal Shree Enterprises, Chaibasa through its proprietor, Sri Sushant Roy
The State of Jharkhand
The Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi
The Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Jharkhand
The Deputy Commissioner, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa
Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
