9. Thus, no interference is warranted at the stage of issuance of show cause notices since it does amount to an adverse order. It is quite possible that after hearing the parties and taking into consideration the reply, the proceeding itself may be dropped. However in a very rare and exceptional circumstance, the High Court may entertain a writ petition at the stage of issuance of show cause notices on the ground of jurisdiction. 10. In the present case, the claim of the petitioner is that the grandfather of his wife was “Sevayat” of the said temple which would also be evident from the final settlement made under section 83(2) of the Act, 1908. It has further been claimed that he worships the deity in the said temple, however, the respondent no.4, who is an influential person, has been trying to evict him from the said land. The said argument of the petitioner is not relevant in the present proceeding in view of the stand of the respondent-State that the said notice has been issued in connection with a proceeding initiated under section 107 Cr.P.C which provides that if an executive magistrate receives information that a person is likely to commit a breach of peace or to disturb the public tranquility or to do any wrongful act that may probably occasion breach of the peace or disturb the public tranquility and is of opinion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding, he may require such person to execute bond for keeping peace for such period not exceeding one year as the magistrate thinks fit. Thus, the intervention of this Court sought by the petitioner under writ jurisdiction on the ground that he may forcefully be evicted in the garb of the said impugned notice appears to be mere imagination and is not such a strong ground to invoke the extraordinary writ jurisdiction at this stage. Moreover, by the reasons of said notice, the petitioner has been called upon to produce documents and evidences alleging that certain illegal activities are going on over the said land, the decision whereupon is yet to be taken. The learned counsel for the petitioner has raised jurisdictional incompetency of the respondent no.2 to issue such notice to the petitioner. However, Section 91 of Cr.P.C, as relied by the respondentState, empowers the Court to issue summons to a person calling upon to produce any document necessary for an appropriate proceeding under the Code. Thus, the petitioner has not been able to show an exceptional
