Dismissed

Basudeo Prasad Yadav and Ors. v. the Union of India through the Joint Secretary Ministry of Tribal Affairs and Ors.

Jharkhand HC6 Apr 2021WPC/1714/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners moved a writ petition in the High Court of Jharkhand challenging certain actions. The petition was heard via video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioners sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise grievances before the appropriate authority.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise grievances before the appropriate authority.

Basudeo Prasad Yadav and Ors. Vs the Union of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.1714 of 2015

¶2

Basudeo Prasad Yadav

¶3

Ram Kishore Yadav

¶4

Pradip Kumar Yadav

¶5

… … Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

The Union of India through the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India, Room No.736, ‘A’ Wing, 7^th Floor, Shastri Bhawan, P.O. and P.S. Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-110115.

¶8

The Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, District-Ranchi.

¶9

Secretary, Department of Agricultural Development, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Jagarnathpur, DistrictRanchi.

¶10

The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. and District-Deoghar.

¶11

The Divisional Forest Officer, Deoghar Division, Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. and District-Deoghar.

¶12

The Circle Officer, Sarath, P.O. & P.S. Sarath, District-Deoghar.

¶13

The Block Development Officer, Sarath, P.O. & P.S. Sarath, DistrictDeoghar.

¶14

The President, Village Educational Committee, Utkrit Madhya Vidyalaya, Karaiya, At mauza Kariaya, P.O. Pathadda, P.S. Sarath, District-Deoghar.

¶15

The Secretary, Utkrit Madhya Vidyalaya, Kariya, At mauza Karaiya, P.O. Pathadda, P.S. Sarath, District-Deoghar … … Respondents

¶16

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

¶17

---

¶18

For the Petitioners : Mr. Vineet Prakash, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Devanand Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ravi Prakash Mishra, Adv.

¶19

---

¶20

The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the parties had no objections with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good.

¶21

---

¶22

09/06.04.2021: After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to raise their grievances before the appropriate authority.

¶23

Counsel for the State has no objection.

¶24

In view of above submission, the present writ petition being W.P.(C) No.1714 of 2015 is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶25

(Rajesh Kumar, J.)

¶26

Amar/-

Basudeo Prasad Yadav and Ors. v. the Union of India through the Joint Secretary Ministry of Tribal Affairs and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Basudeo Prasad Yadav and Ors. v. the Union of India through the Joint Secretary Ministry of Tribal Affairs and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Gulf Ashley Motors Ltd. Vs State of Jharkhand And Ors.

Baleshwar Yadav And Ors. Vs State of Jharkhand And Ors.

Chiman Lal Sharma Vs State of Jharkhand And Ors.

Nikesh Kumar Vs Vineta Devi

MD Tahir Vs Home Department

Rupna Tirkey Vs State of Jharkhand And Ors.