The State of Jharkhand v. Sarju Ram
Case brief
What is this about?
The State of Jharkhand withdrew its appeal before this High Court stating that the impugned judgment had been complied with.
The State of Jharkhand withdrew its appeal before this High Court stating that the impugned judgment had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
L. P. A. No. 351 of 2019
Versus
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
For the Appellants : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, Sr. S.C.-I
Oral Order 07 / Dated : 01.10.2021
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sinha, learned Sr. S.C.-I appearing for the
State, on instruction, seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this appeal in
view of the fact that the order passed by the learned Single Judge, which
has been assailed in the present appeal, has already been complied.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, C.J . )
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
Raman/AKT
The State of Jharkhand
Sarju Ram
Sujit Narayan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court