Dismissed

The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary Building Construction Department v. Satyendra Kumar Construction Pvt. Ltd. through Its Director Deepak Kumar

Jharkhand HC3 Mar 2021LPA/247/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appeals filed by the State against decisions of the Building Construction Corporation Ltd. were dismissed as they had become infructuous. The tender had been withdrawn and a fresh tender had been floated and assigned to another person, making the appeals no longer pressing. Consequently, the appealed orders and pending interlocutory applications stand dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The appeals and pending interlocutory applications are dismissed as they have become infructuous.

The State of Jharkhand through the Principal… — Company and Corporate | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

L.P.A. No. 246 of 2019

¶3

(with I.A. Nos.4125/2019, 2820/2019)

¶4

1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O., P.S. Dhurwa & District – Ranchi.

¶5

2. The Jharkhand State Building Construction Corporation Ltd., Ranchi having its registered office at Building Construction Department, Project Building, P.O., P.S. Dhurwa & District – Ranchi through its Managing Director.

¶6

3. The Managing Director, Jharkhand State Building Construction Corporation Ltd., Ranchi having its registered office at Building Construction Department, Project Building, P.O., P.S. Dhurwa & District – Ranchi.

¶7

4. The Executive Director-cum-Chairman, Tender Committee, Jharkhand State Building Construction Corporation Ltd., Ranchi having its registered office at Building Construction Department, Project Building, P.O., P.S. Dhurwa & District – Ranchi,

¶8

5. The General Manager (Project)-cum-Member, Tender Committee, Jharkhand State Building Construction Corporation Ltd., Ranchi having its registered office at Building Construction Department, Project Building, P.O., P.S. Dhurwa & District – Ranchi.

¶9

6. The Deputy General Manager (Finance & Account)-cum-Member, Tender Committee, Jharkhand State Building Construction Corporation Ltd., Ranchi having its registered office at Building Construction Department, Project Building, P.O., P.S. Dhurwa & District – Ranchi.

¶10

… … Respondents/Appellants

¶11

Versus

¶12

Satyendra Kumar Construction Pvt. Ltd. Having its registered office at 202, Hira Enclave, New Dak Banglow Road, P.O. New Dak Banglow, P.S. Kotwali, District – Patna through its Director Deepak Kumar, S/o Sri Narayan Prasad, R/o 301A, Dev Kutir Apartment, Jagat Narayan Road, P.O. Kadam Kuan, P.S. Kadam Kuan and District–Patna (Bihar) … … Writ Petitioner/Respondent

¶13

With

¶14

L.P.A. No. 247 of 2019

¶15

(with I.A. Nos.2821/2019, 2822/2019)

¶16

1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, P.O., P.S. Dhurwa & District – Ranchi.

-2-

… … Respondents/Appellants

¶24

Versus

¶25

Satyendra Kumar Construction Pvt. Ltd. Having its registered office at 202, Hira Enclave, New Dak Banglow Road, P.O. New Dak Banglow, P.S. Kotwali, District – Patna through its Director Deepak Kumar, S/o Sri Narayan Prasad, R/o 301A, Dev Kutir Apartment, Jagat Narayan Road, P.O. Kadam Kuan, P.S. Kadam Kuan and District–Patna (Bihar)

¶26

… … Writ Petitioner/Respondent

¶27

CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

¶28

¶29

For the Appellants: Mr. Piyush Chitresh, A.C. to A.G. For the Respondent: Mr. Abhay Prakash, Advocate

¶30

Oral Order 05/Dated: 03.03.2021

¶31

With consent of the parties, hearing of this matter has been done through video conferencing. They have no complaint about any audio and visual quality.

¶32

Mr. Piyush Chitresh, learned A.C. to A.G. appearing for the appellants-State, informs that in view of the subsequent development that the tender itself was withdrawn and thereafter fresh tender has been floated and assigned to some other person, he would not be pressing these appeals as the same have become infructuous.

¶33

Accordingly, both these appeals are dismissed as not pressed.

¶34

Consequently, the pending Interlocutory Applications stand disposed of.

¶35

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, C.J.)

¶36

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

¶37

Manoj/Raman

The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary Building Construction Department v. Satyendra Kumar Construction Pvt. Ltd. through Its Director Deepak Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary Building Construction Department v. Satyendra Kumar Construction Pvt. Ltd. through Its Director Deepak Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G M I T I through Its One of Its Director Binay Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Jagdish Sharma and Anr. Vs the State of Jharkhand through Circle Officer Sadar Chaibasa and Anr.

Santosh Vikral Vs the State of Jharkhand and Ors.

The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary Building Construction Department Vs Satyendra Kumar Construction Pvt. Ltd. through Its Director Deepak Kumar

The Jharkhand State Electricity Board through Its Chairman Vs Umesh Prasad Choudhary

Smt Pandwa Devi Vs Central Coalfields Limited through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director