The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the appellants to withdraw their criminal appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with a direction that the lower court may decide on a separate bail prayer on its merits.
Permission granted to withdraw the appeal; the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.111 of 2021
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
--- For the Appellant : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Adv. For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, A.P.P. For the Res. No.2 : Mrs. Atefa Parvez, Adv.
---
The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the parties had no objections with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good.
---
permission to withdraw the present appeal.
Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Res.
No.2 have no objection.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the present appeal being Criminal Appeal (S.J.)
No.111 of 2021 is, hereby, dismissed as withdrawn.
However, if the appellants surrenders and prays for regular bail, the court below will decide it on its own merit without being prejudiced to the withdrawal order.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Amar/-
Kailash Yadav @ Kailash Mahto, Bonga Yadav @ Bona Mahto, Ekanand Yadav, Sudhir Yadav
The State of Jharkhand
Geeta Devi
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
