No order for the petitioner due to non-appearance. The court disposed of the pending incidental application as the main revision was already concluded by compromise.
I.A. No.935 of 2007 is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.902 of 2006
Shrawan Kumar Ghiria
..... Petitioner
State of Jharkhand & Anr.
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : None For the State : Ms. Nehala Sharmin, Advocate
Through : Video Conferencing
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
R.Kumar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether further order is required in the pending incidental application given that the main revision was disposed of via compromise
Shrawan Kumar Ghiria
State of Jharkhand & Anr.
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
