19. Considering the totality of facts and circumstances of the case and after going through the materials on record including deposition of the witnesses, this Court finds that the prosecution has not been able to prove the case against the petitioner beyond shadow of all reasonable doubts, as they have not been able to produce any evidence that the petitioner was driving the vehicle at the time and place of occurrence. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court finds that judgment of conviction passed by the learned trial court and confirmed by the learned appellate court suffers from perversity calling for interference in revisional jurisdiction to secure the ends of justice. Accordingly, the petitioner is acquitted and he is discharged from the liability under his bail bond. Consequently, the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 12.06.2006 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur in G.R. Case No. 1202/98, T.R. No. 72/06 and also the judgment dated 06.10.2007 passed by the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur in Cr. Appeal No. 184/06 are hereby set-aside.
