Dismissed
Gopal Mahto v. Shiwani Devi
Jharkhand HCCr.Rev./423/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 423 of 2012
Gopal Mahto, Son of Late Baneshwar Mahto, Resident of Village- Jharkhand Bhuli More, P.O.- Bhuli Nagar, P.S. – Bankmore, District- Dhanbad. … … Petitioner
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
Through: Video Conferencing
14 /05.08.2021
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. H. K. Mahato is present along with Ms. Ahalya Mahato, Advocate.
2. Learned counsel for the opposite parties Ms. Gouri Devi is also present.
3. This criminal revision application has been filed for the following reliefs: -
“That the petitioner prays for setting aside the Order dated 29.06.2011 passed in M.P. Case No. 228 of 2006 by Sri Mrityunjay Mahato, the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dhanbad in a Proceeding Under Section 125 of the Criminal procedure Code, by which though it is proved that O.P. No. 1 Shiwani Devi is not the Wife of the petitioner but her daughter O.P. No. 2 namely Sushila Kumari is the daughter of him and the petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Rs. 2,000/- per month as Maintenance per month from the date of order for maintenance of the daughter.
The petitioner prays for setting aside the aforesaid Order as it has not been proved that said Sushila Kumari is out of any relation of the Petitioner with O.P. No.-1 and also for the fact that the petitioner has no any regular fixed income.”
2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present petition.
5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties does not have any objection to the prayer made.
6. Accordingly, the present criminal revision petition is dismissed as not pressed.
7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
8. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, are closed.
9. Let the Lower Court Records be sent back to the court concerned.
10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court below through ‘E-mail/FAX’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Mukul
Gopal Mahto
Shiwani Devi
Sushila Kumari
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court