This High Court of Jharkhand dismissed two writ petitions challenging a judgment in a Section 498A case. The Court held that since the petitioners were acquitted in the trial court, the present proceedings became infructuous and were dismissed.
Criminal Revision No.337 of 2012 and Cr.M.P. No.643 of 2009 were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Criminal Revision No.337 of 2012
With
Cr.M.P. No.643 of 2009
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
--For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the State : Ms. Nehala Sharmin, Advocate (In Cr.M.P. No.643 of 2009) : Mr. Sanjay Srivastava, Advocate (In Cr. Rev. No.337 of 2012) ---
Through Video Conferencing
10/06.08.2021 Criminal Revision No.337 of 2012 has been filed challenging the order dated 02.04.2012 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class Ranchi in Complaint No.2258 of
2
2008 whereby the petition filed on behalf of the petitioners dated 21.11.2011 for discharge under Section – 245 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been rejected.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Saurav/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether criminal revision and C.M.P. are maintainable after the petitioners have been acquitted in the underlying complaint.
Whether the present proceedings have become infructuous following the acquittal of the petitioners.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vishwanath Roy and others
The State of Jharkhand
Ranjeeta Roy
Arti Roy and others
The State of Jharkhand
Ranjeeta Roy
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
