The High Court of Jharkhand permitted the withdrawal of the criminal revision after the parties submitted that the matter was settled, and subsequently dismissed the revision.
Permission granted to withdraw the criminal revision; the criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Rev. No. 1371 of 2017 Dilip Kumar Gurung … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Reema Kumari … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Chakraverty, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashok Kumar, APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Vijayant Verma, Advocate ---
The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the parties had no objections with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good.
--- 06/20.11.2021: It has been submitted by the counsel for the revisionist that the matter has been settled between the parties and as such, he seeks permission to withdraw this criminal revision.
Permission is accorded.
This criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Ravi/-
Dilip Kumar Gurung
The State of Jharkhand
Reema Kumari
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
