Dismissed

Kumar Sundram Bhardwaj v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC11 Sept 2021Cont.(Cvl)/80/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt proceeding filed for non-compliance with a prior order in a service dispute, the court directed the District Superintendent of Education to pass an order on teacher promotion claims consistent with Memo No.619 dated 26.08.2021, within eight weeks, and closed the matter.

What did the court decide?

The District Superintendent of Education, Gumla directed to decide the matter in light of Memo No.619 dated 26.08.2021 within eight weeks.

Kumar Sundram Bhardwaj Vs the State of Jharkhand — Service and Employment | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

AWARD

¶2

BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT (Virtual)

¶3

DATED 11.09.2021

¶4

(Held Through Video Conferencing at Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi)

¶5

[Organized by High Court Legal Services Committee under Section 19, Legal Services Authorities

¶6

Act, 1987 (Central Act)].

¶7

Cont. Case (Civil) No.80 of 2020

¶8

Petitioner/Appellant : Kumar Sundaram Bhardwaj

¶9

Versus

¶10

Respondent/O.P.(s)

¶11

: The State of Jharkhand and Anr.

¶12

Present :-

¶13

Name of Hon’ble Judge : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sujit Narayan Prasad Name of Advocate Member : Mr. Prakash Chandra Roy, Standing Counsel

¶14

Award

¶15

The matter was taken up in National Lok Adalat in virtual mode.

¶16

The instant contempt case has been filed against the opposite parties for alleged, willful and deliberate non-compliance of the order dated 06.08.2019 passed in W.P.(S) No.1846 of 2018.

¶17

Mr. Deepak Kr. Dubey, learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that although the show cause has been filed but as per the instruction, decision has been taken by the competent authority.

¶18

He further submits that since Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Under Secretary to the Directorate Primary Education is present in the Court proceeding through virtual mode, as such, he may also assist this Court in the matter.

¶19

Upon this, Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Under Secretary to the Directorate Primary Education has submitted that whatever has been said by the learned counsel for the opposite party about the decision having been taken by the competent authority with respect to the consideration of cases of promotion of one or the other teachers has already been taken vide Memo No.619 dated 26.08.2021.

¶20

In terms thereof, there is no difficulty now in taking decision with respect to the claim of the petitione, therefore, the matter may be disposed of.

¶21

Upon this, Mr. Rahul Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that appropriate order may be passed.

¶22

This Court, after considering the aforesaid submission and in the light of the decision taken by the authority as under Memo No.619 dated 26.08.2021, deems it fit and proper to dispose of the matter with the direction upon the District Superintendent of Education, Gumla to take decision in the light of the decision contained in Memo No.619 dated 26.08.2021 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order.

¶23

In view thereof, the instant contempt case is finally closed, accordingly, disposed of.

¶24

Office is directed to keep the Memo No.619 dated 26.08.2021, sent through e-mail, on record.

¶25

Sign. of Hon’ble Judge

¶26

Sign. of Advocate Member

¶27

(Seal of the Committee)

Kumar Sundram Bhardwaj v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumar Sundram Bhardwaj v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Prasad Yadav Vs State of Jharkhand

Ms Maa Vaishno Devi Stone Mines through Its Partner Vijay Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Deptt of Mines and Geology

Ms Gausia Stone through Its Partner MD Subhan Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Deptt of Mines and Geology

Joydeb Chatterjee Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sita Ram Saw Vs the State of Jharkhand

Tarkeshwar Thakur Vs the State of Jharkhand