Dismissed

The State Highways Authority of Jharkhand through Its Chief Executive Officer v. Rcm Infrastructure Limited through the Managing Director

Jharkhand HC6 Oct 2021COM.APPEAL/13/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Commercial Appeals were heard with parties' consent via video conferencing. The appellant withdrew both appeals with liberty to avail statutory remedies, resulting in their dismissal.

What did the court decide?

Both appeals were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail the remedy available in law.

What the court decided

The State Highways Authority of Jharkhand through… — Company and Corporate | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

Commercial Appeal No. 13 of 2020

¶3

The State Highways Authority of Jharkhand through its Chief Executive Officer, State Highways Authority of Jharkhand (SHAJ), R/o Deendayal Nagar, Booty Road (Near Office of Executive Engineer, N.H. Ranchi Division), Ranchi-834008 (Jharkhand)

¶4

.... …. Appellant

¶5

Versus

¶6

RCM Infrastructure Limited, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, through the Managing Director, RCM Infrastructure Limited, 8-2-622/5/A2, Indira Chambers, 2^nd Floor, Avenue-4, Road No.-10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad-500034

¶7

.... .... Respondents

¶8

with

¶9

Commercial Appeal No. 14 of 2020

¶10

¶11

.... …. Appellant

Versus

.... Respondent

CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

¶16

-----For the Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashutosh Anand, Advocate

¶17

For the Respondent : M/s Prashant Pallav & Parth Jalan, Advocates

¶18

Oral Order

¶19

14 / Dated : 06.10.2021

¶20

With consent of the parties, hearing of the matters has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.

¶21

Heard Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned senior counsel along with Mr. Ashutosh Anand, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Prashant

¶22

¶23

Pallav assisted by Mr. Parth Jalan, learned counsel for the respondent on the issue of maintainability of the appeals.

¶24

After some argument learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave of this Court to withdraw both the appeals with a liberty to avail the remedy which would be available to him in law.

¶25

Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn with

¶26

the aforesaid liberty granted to the appellant.

¶27

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, C.J . )

¶28

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

¶29

Raman/AKT

The State Highways Authority of Jharkhand through Its Chief Executive Officer v. Rcm Infrastructure Limited through the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

The State Highways Authority of Jharkhand through Its Chief Executive Officer v. Rcm Infrastructure Limited through the Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T v R Raju Vs the Tin Plate Company of India Limited through Its Manager Administration Shri Lokesh Verma

Ms Coal India Ltd. through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director Disciplinary Authority Vs Dr Jitendra Kumar Sharma

Anita Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Human Resources Development Department

Ms Jai Bajrang Walee Stone Works through Its Proprietor Prakash Chandra Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

The State Highways Authority of Jharkhand through Its Chief Executive Officer Vs Rcm Infrastructure Limited through the Managing Director

Premsons and Bairoliya Trust through Sri Pankaj Kumar Poddar Vs State of Jharkhand through Its Health Secretary