Allowed

Habib Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC21 Dec 2021A.B.A./7936/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226, the court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, a husband accused under Sections 498A and 494 IPC,条件是 he deposit interim victim compensation and submit a bail bond to the court below.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail by depositing ₹80,000/- as interim victim compensation and furnishing a bail bond of ₹25,000/- with two sureties.

Habib Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand — Dowry and Cruelty | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B. A. No. 7936 of2021

¶2

Habib Ansari … Petitioner

¶3

Versus

¶4

The State of Jharkhand&Anr. … Opposite Parties

¶5

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶6

For the Petitioner : Mr. P.C. Sinha ,Adv. For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan ,Addl. P.P. For the O.P. No. : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Adv.

¶7

03 / 21.12.2021 Heard the parties.

¶8

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Bhelwaghati P.S. Case No. 2 of 2021 registered under Sections 323, 341, 325, 427, 494, 498A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the husband of the informant, treated the informant with cruelty. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and those allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigationof the case and he undertakes to pay Rs. 80,000/- to the opposite party no. 2 as ad interim victim compensation without prejudice to his defence hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶10

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶11

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of eight weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 80,000/- by way of demand draft drawn in favour of the opposite party no. 2as

¶12

ad interim victim compensation without prejudice to his defence and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learnedJ.M., Giridih in connection with Bhelwaghati P.S. Case No. 2 of 2021 subject to the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with theInvestigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶13

In case of depositing aforesaid demand draft by the petitioner, learned court below is directed to issue notice to the opposite party no. 2and release the demand draft in her favour on proper identification forthwith and if the said amount is deposited by the petitioner, the same will be adjusted towards maintenance in any proceeding between the parties in future or the final settlement, if any, takes place between the parties.

¶14

( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)

¶15

Smita/-

Habib Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Habib Ansari v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muhammad Sabid Mir Alias Sabid Mir Vs the State of Jharkhand

Deepak Kumar Singh Alias Deepak Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ranjit Kumar Lal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited and Anr. Vs M/S Brenda Sales Private Limit

MD Asiruddin Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mahesh Chandra Rawani Alias Mahesh Chandravanshi Vs the State of Jharkhand