This order is from the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in C.M.P. No.473 of 2018. The Court condoned a three-day delay in filing the petition and restored a earlier matter (M.A. No.282 of 2013) to its file by a single Bench.
Delay of three days condoned; M.A. No.282 of 2013 restored to original file; C.M.P. No.473 of 2018 allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.473 of 2018
Sumeru
… … Petitioner
Versus
… … Opp. Parties
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
--- For the Petitioner : Mr. K.L. Ojha, Adv. For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Adv.
---
The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsel for the parties had no objections with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good.
---
05/05.03.2021: Defect no.2 as pointed out by the office stands corrected as
supplementary affidavit has already been filed by the petitioner.
I.A. No.10923 of 2018
The present interlocutory application has been filed for condoning
the delay of 3 days in filing the present petition.
Counsel for the other side has no objection.
In view of nature of dispute and the reason assigned in the petition,
the delay of three days in filing in present petition is, hereby, condoned.
Accordingly, the interlocutory application being I.A. No.10923 of
2018 stands allowed.
C.M.P. No.473 of 2018
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for
the opposite parties.
Considering the nature of dispute between the parties and reason assigned in the present petition, the M.A. No.282 of 2013 is, hereby, restored to its original file.
Accordingly, the present C.M.P. No.473 of 2018 stands allowed.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Amar/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the petition should be condoned.
Whether the proceedings under M.A. No.282 of 2013 should be restored.
Sumeru
The Union of India
The Chief Secretary, Ministry of Railway
The General Manager of South Eastern Railway
Deputy Railway Manager, South Eastern Railway
Central Eastern Railway, Danapur
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
