Dismissed

Shyam Kishore Sharma v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC15 Mar 2021A.B.A./257/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Ranchi granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners accused of transportation of stolen coal mischief under Sections 379 and 411 IPC, directing surrender within six weeks on deposit of cash security and furnishing a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Privileges of anticipatory bail granted subject to surrender within six weeks, cash security of Rs.2,000 each, bail bond of Rs.25,000 each with two sureties, and adherence to investigation conditions.

Shyam Kishore Sharma Vs the State of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B.A. No.257 of 2021

¶3

------

¶4

Shyam Kishore Sharma

¶5

Pintu Kumar

¶6

Mishri Saw

¶7

.... .... …. Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Jharkhand .... .... ....Opposite Party

¶10

------

¶11

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶12

For the Petitioners : Mr. S. Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. V. K. Vashistha, Addl.P.P

¶13

Order No.02 Dated- 15.03.2021

¶14

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

¶15

Apprehending their arrest in connection with Mandu (W.B.) P.S. Case No.237 of 2020 instituted under Sections 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners are respectively the owners of the motorcycles bearing registration Nos.JH 02R 2483, JH 02AT 8540 and JH 02V 0729 and the same were involved in transportation of stolen coal. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-14 of the instant anticipatory bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶17

Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

¶18

Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court of learned A.C.J.M., Ramgarh within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.2,000/-(Rupees two thousand) each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like

¶19

amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Ramgarh in connection with Mandu (W.B.) P.S. Case No.237 of 2020 with the condition that they will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶21

Animesh/

Shyam Kishore Sharma v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyam Kishore Sharma v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

MD Sahrukh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kamna Roy Alias Kamana Roy Vs the Union of India through Central Bureau of of Investigation

Soleman Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ashok Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ashish Kumar Mishra Vs the State of Jharkhand

Yogesh Kumar Alias Yogesh Kumar Sahu Vs the State of Jharkhand