Allowed

Shankar Das v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC9 Mar 2021B.A./2525/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand, Ranchi, hearing a bail petition regarding the Deoghar Cyber P.S. case, granted bail to the petitioner upon receiving a personal undertaking from his counsel to address defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter, directing the issuance of a bail bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Shankar Das Vs the State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 2525 of 2021

¶2

Shankar Das … Petitioner

¶3

Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶4

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶5

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashutosh Pd. Joshi , Adv. For the State : Mr. S.K. Tiwari , Addl. P.P.

¶6

02 / 09.03.2021 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner personally

¶8

undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over.

¶9

In view of the personal undertaking given by learned counsel for the petitioner the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter are ignored for the present.

¶10

The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. case no. 71 of 2020 registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66(B)/ 66(C)/ 66(D)/84(C) of the I.T. Act.

¶11

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is a cyber criminal and from the custody of the petitioner, two mobile phones with sim cards, one ATM card and three bank passbooks have been recovered. It is then submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been in judicial custody for a considerable period of time and the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be released on bail.

¶12

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶13

Considering the facts of the case, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like

¶14

amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. case no. 71 of 2020 subject to the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case.

¶15

( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)

¶16

Smita/-

Shankar Das v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shankar Das v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand

Vikraj Soni Alias Punni Alias Vikraj Gupta Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ulman Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dilip Paswan Vs the State of Jharkhand

Tinku Alias Mahtab Alam Vs the State of Jharkhand

Nikhil Keshari Alias Nikhil Keshri Vs the State of Jharkhand