Allowed

Vikraj Soni Alias Punni Alias Vikraj Gupta v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC8 Mar 2021B.A./2416/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted to Vikraj Soni in connection with Excise Act case involving preparation of illicit liquor upon his undertaking to correct stamp defects. Bail fixed at Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Garhwa.

Vikraj Soni Alias Punni Alias Vikraj Gupta Vs the State… — Cheque Dishonour | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2416 of 2021

¶2

Vikraj Soni @ Punni @ Vikraj Gupta

¶3

… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶4

------

¶5

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶6

For the Petitioner : Mr. Gopal K. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Md. Hatim, Addl. P.P.

¶7

------

¶8

Order No.02 Dated- 08.03.2021

¶9

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over.

¶11

In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present.

¶12

The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Complaint Case No.25 of 2021 registered under sections 47(a) of the Excise Act.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in preparation of illicit country made liquor. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 05.01.2021 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

¶14

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Garhwa, in connection with

¶15

Complaint Case No.25 of 2021 with the condition that he will cooperate with the trial of the case.

¶16

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶17

Sonu-Gunjan/

Vikraj Soni Alias Punni Alias Vikraj Gupta v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikraj Soni Alias Punni Alias Vikraj Gupta v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahadeo Swansi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ezaz Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dil Mohammmad Vs the State of Jharkhand

Jitendra Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ulman Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ashutosh Kumar Tiwari Vs the State of Jharkhand