An order dismissing three anticipatory bail applications as withdrawn because the respective petitioners had died, heard via video conferencing.
Applications dismissed as withdrawn due to death of petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1975 of 2020
Tushar Kanti Paul … Petitioner Versus The Union of India through C.B.I. … Opposite Party With A.B.A. No. 471 of 2020
Rajesh Kumar Gupta … Petitioner Versus The Union of India through C.B.I. … Opposite Party With A.B.A. No. 1109 of 2020
Anil Kumar Singh … Petitioner Versus The Union of India through C.B.I. … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Vishal, Advocate : Mr. Ajay Kr. Sah, Advocate For the C.B.I. : Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate
------
Order No.04 Dated- 19.07.2021
Heard the parties through video conferencing.
The Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw these anticipatory bail applications, since the petitioners have died.
these bail are Accordingly, anticipatory applications dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Sonu/Gunjan-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail applications pending in three separate petitions should be passed on or dismissed since the petitioners have died.
Tushar Kanti Paul
Rajesh Kumar Gupta
Anil Kumar Singh
The Union of India through C.B.I.
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
