Naresh Rai v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ranchi, rejecting a second bail application, declined to reconsider the petition due to the nature of the rape allegations and prior rejection, directing expedited trial.
What did the court decide?
Bail prayer rejected; direction to trial court to expedite trial within six months.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 10414 of 2021
Naresh Rai … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
For the Petitioner : Mr. P. K. Mukhopadhyay, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Someshwar Roy, A.P.P.
2/17.11.2021 Heard the parties.
Defects as pointed out by the office are ignored.
The petitioner is an accused in connection with S. T. No. 82 of 2021 arising out of Topchanchi P.S. Case No. 91 of 2020 corresponding to G. R. No. 2523 of 2020.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer for bail of the petitioner accused of rape should be reconsidered in view of the unexamined witnesses and custody duration.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Naresh Rai
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
Coram
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- B.A./10414/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court