Permission to withdraw was granted. The writ petition and connected I.A. were dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted; the writ petition and I.A. No.1854 of 2014 were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.762 of 2014
--------
M/s. Corporate Ispat Alloys Ltd. …… Petitioner
Versus The Union of India & Anr. …… Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Nandan, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Amrendra Pradhan, Advocate ----------------------------
06 / Dated 14th January, 2020
Mr. Anjani Nandan, A.C. to Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. He submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
Mr. Amrendra Pradhan, learned counsel for the respondents is present
he has got no objection, if such permission is accorded.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
In consequence thereof, I.A. No.1854 of 2014 also stands dismissed.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Madhav/-
M/s. Corporate Ispat Alloys Ltd.
The Union of India & Anr.
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
