The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn subject to liberty to approach appropriate authority.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to raise grievances before the appropriate authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 4800 of 2017
Anju Devi @ Anju Kumari … ... Petitioner
… … Respondents
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N. PATHAK
-------For the Petitioner : Mr. Arwind Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, A.C. to S.C. VI. Mr. Radha Krishna Gupta, JAC.
Order No.08: Dated: 11th February, 2020
Per Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.:
I.A. No.1200 of 2020
W.P.(S) No. 4800 of 2017
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
MM
Anju Devi @ Anju Kumari
State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Education and Human Resources Ministry, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi
Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, Deoghar
District Education Officer, Deoghar
Dr. S.N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
