The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge a specific part of the order, resulting in the petition's dismissal.
Prayer to withdraw the writ petition is allowed; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge part of the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2030 of 2018
Janardan Kumar
… …. Petitioner
Vs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK
For Petitioners : Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, Advocate For Respondents Mr. Piyush Chitresh, AC to AG
------
07/ 11.02.2020 Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ petition as most of the grievances of the petitioner have already been redressed with a liberty to challenge the part of the order.
Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to such prayer. Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
punit/
Janardan Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Jail and Disaster Management, Govt. of Jharkhand
The Under Secretary, Department of Home, Jail & Disaster Management, Govt. of Jharkhand
The Director General of Police, Jharkhand
The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Palamau Range
Dr. S. N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
