A single judge dismissed a writ petition against interim maintenance orders as infructuous because the lower courts had already passed a final maintenance order. The incidental application was also dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 244 of 2015 With
I.A. No. 2898 of 2015
Pranay Kumar, Son of Ravikant Srivastava, resident of Old Commissioners Compound last Lane, Under Police Station- Daily Market, Post Office- Main Road, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) … Petitioner
-Versus-
Smt. Priyanka Raj, wife of Pranaya Kumar, daughter of Rakesh Kumar, resident of Old Commissioners Compound last Lane, Under Police Station- Daily Market, Post Office- Main Road, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) at present residing at C/o Annapurna Kutir, Court Road near Bihar Club, Ranchi under Police Station- Kotwali, Post Office- G.P.O. Ranchi, District- Ranchi
… Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner : Mr. Saket Upadhyay, Advocate For the Respondent :
08/24.01.2020. Mr. Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instruction
submits that this writ petition has become infructuous as this writ petition has been filed against the interim order of maintenance and now final order has already been passed by the court below.
In view of the aforesaid submission of Mr. Upadhyay, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
Accordingly, I.A. No. 2898 of 2015 also stands dismissed.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Ajay/
Pranay Kumar
Smt. Priyanka Raj
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
