The single-judge High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi dismissed a writ petition as infructuous without appearance by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.2163 of 2015
--------
Basanteshwari Prasad …… Petitioner
Versus Hemant Prasad & Ors. …… Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. K.K. Ambastha, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, A.C. to S.C. (L&C)
06 / Dated 20th January, 2020
Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Office note suggests the notices upon respondent nos.3 and 6 have been received personally. Notice upon respondent no.4 has been received by her son. Respondent no.1 has refused to accept the notice. Thus, notices upon respondent nos.1,3 and 6 are deemed to be validly served.
Mr. K.K. Ambastha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.6 submits at bar that the Probate Case No.173 of 2009 has already been disposed of which is the subject matter of this writ petition, therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Madhav/-
Basanteshwari Prasad
Hemant Prasad
Respondent-State
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
