6. Per contra, counter-affidavit has been filed. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents vehemently opposes the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that on a complaint made against the petitioner, the matter was referred to the Commissioner, South Chhotanagpur Division, Ranchi and thereafter, a Three Member Enquiry Team was set-up by the Commissioner. On the basis of enquiry report, the Board of Revenue, Jharkhand, Ranchi requested the Cabinet (Vigilance Department) for vigilance enquiry in the matter. Thereafter, Shri Sakaldeo Ram, Police Inspector-cum-Investigating Officer, AntiCorruption Bureau, Chaibasa investigated the matter and submitted his report dated 05.07.2015 to the Superintendent of Police, Anti-Corruption Bureau, Ranchi. Thereafter, the Superintendent of Police requested the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi to accord permission to lodge FIR against the petitioner for creating illegal Jamabandi in Register-II and issuance of rent receipt thereafter. Subsequently, a departmental proceeding was initiated against the petitioner, in which petitioner was found guilty of the charges levelled against her. On the basis of enquiry report and on the basis of reply to the second showcause submitted by the petitioner, the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi passed the punishment order, whereby petitioner was made to compulsorily retire w.e.f. 01.07.2017 under Rule 14(ix) Vol. V of Jharkhand Govt. Servant (Classification, Control & Appeal), Rules, 2016. Thereafter, petitioner preferred appeal which also stood dismissed. Learned counsel accordingly submits that for the aforesaid facts, the instant writ application is not maintainable and liable to be dismissed.
