Dismissed

Sita Ram v. the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms

Jharkhand HC19 Oct 2020LPA/416/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order withdrew an appeal with liberty to pursue other remedies. The court expressly stated that the withdrawal does not prejudice the appellant's right to approach other forums, as no opinion was formed on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue other legal remedies.

Sita Ram Vs the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary… — Land Acquisition | Jharkhand HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

L. P. A. No. 416 of 2019

¶3

With

¶4

I.A. No. 5515 of 2019

¶5

Sita Ram, aged about 63 years, son of Late Pancham Ram, resident of village-Khorhar, P.O. & P.S. Barhi, District-Hazaribag (Jharkhand)

¶6

.... .... …. Appellant

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms, Project Bhawan, HEC, P.O. & P.S.Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶9

The Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Project Bhawan, P.O. & P.S.Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand.

¶10

The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribag, P.O., P.S. & District Hazaribagh.

¶11

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Hazaribag, P.O., P.S. & District Hazaribagh.

¶12

Damodar Valley Corporation Limited through its Chairman, having its office at DVC Tower, 5^th Floor, Ulta Danga, VIP Road, P.O. & P.S. Kolkata, District Kolkata.

¶13

.... .... …. Respondents

¶14

¶15

CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD

¶16

-----For the Appellant : Mr. Bhaiya V. Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashutosh Anand, A.A.G.-III For the DVC : Mr. Srijit Choudhary, Advocate ------

¶17

Oral Order

¶18

06 / Dated : 19.10.2020

¶19

With consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done

¶20

through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.

¶21

Learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw this

¶22

appeal with a liberty to pursue the legal remedy which may be available to the appellant.

¶23

There is no objection from other side.

¶24

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the

¶25

aforesaid liberty.

¶26

¶27

However, it is made clear that this dismissal as withdrawal would not come in the way of the appellant in raising the issue before any forum, if any, available to him as we have not expressed or formed any opinion with regard to the merit of the case.

¶28

Consequent to dismissal of this appeal, I.A. No. 5515 of 2019 also stands disposed of.

¶29

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, C.J . )

¶30

(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)

¶31

VK/AKT

Sita Ram v. the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sita Ram v. the State of Jharkhand through the Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harshit Grower Vs the State of Jharkhand

Panda Hassa Vs the State of Jharkhand

Subham Sharma Alias Chhotu Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dhaneshwar Sao Vs the Chairman Cum Managing Director Central Coalfields Limited

State of Jharkhand through Secretary Department of Finance Vs Kamla Devi

Justice Vikramaditya Prasad Vs Union of India through the Pay and Accounts Officer