This order transferred the valuation of the appeal to the Judicial Commissioner under a specific Amendment Act due to procedural amendments. Interlocutory applications were rejected in absentia.
Appeal transmitted to Judicial Commissioner; IA-Nos 7099/2019 and 7267/2019 rejected as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No. 16 of 2011
Anand Baraik … Appellant Versus Ranjeet Bahadur Singh … Respondent
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : None
------
Order No.23 Dated- 05.10.2020 I.A. No.7099 of 2019
No one turns up on behalf of the respondent-petitioner.
Accordingly, this interlocutory application is rejected as not
pressed.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
I.A. No.7267 of 2019
No one turns up on behalf of the respondent-petitioner. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is rejected as not pressed.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
First Appeal No. 16 of 2011
Perusal of the record reveals that the valuation of the appeal is Rs.8,65,000/-.
In view of the amendment in The Bengal, Agra and Assam Civil Courts (Jharkhand Amendment) Act, 2018 (Jharkhand Act No.-09/2019) , Registry is directed to transmit this appeal to the Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi for disposal in accordance with law.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Gunjan-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anand Baraik
Ranjeet Bahadur Singh
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
