Allowed

Rajesh Kumar Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC5 Oct 2020A.B.A./3048/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in connection with a case regarding illegal transportation of sand via tractors, allowing their release upon arrest if arrested or surrender within six weeks upon deposit of cash security and furnishing a bail bond.

What did the court decide?

Grant of privilege of anticipatory bail subject to deposit of ₹10,000 cash security and a ₹25,000 bail bond with two sureties.

Rajesh Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3048 of 2020

¶2

Rajesh Kumar Yadav 2. Daroga Tudu … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------

¶3

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶4

For the Petitioners : Mr. R.P. Ram, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Verma, Spl. P.P.

¶5

------

¶6

Order No.03 Dated- 05.10.2020

¶7

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

¶8

Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.20 of 2020 registered under sections 379/411/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 4/54 of Jharkhand Minor Minerals Concessions Rule, 2004, and under Section 9/13 of Jharkhand Khanij Vikreta Rules, 2007.

¶9

The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners were owners of the tractors which were involved in transportation of illegally excavated sand. It is further submitted that the allegation against the petitioners are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioners are ready and willing to furnish sufficient security including cash security and undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶10

Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶11

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the above named petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- each and on furnishing

¶12

bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1^st Class, Godda, in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.20 of 2020 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶13

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶14

Gunjan-

Rajesh Kumar Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Kumar Yadav v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bittu Kumar Gupta Vs the State of Jharkhand

Balku Bedia Vs the State of Jharkhand

Shahnawaz Alam Vs the State of Jharkhand

Anand Baraik Vs Ranjeet Bahadur Singh

Raushan Tirki Alias Roshan Tirki Vs the State of Jharkhand

Noor Hassan Vs the State of Jharkhand