High Court dismissed the criminal petition seeking quarantine of the framing order, holding that minor discrepancies in evidence are matters for trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M.P. No.2582 of 2018
Tribhuwan Yadav, Aged about 53 years, Son of late Pitamber Yadav, Resident of Bilotand, P.O. – Kharagdiha, P.S. – Deori, District – Giridih … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand through Vigilance
… … Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shekhar Prasad Sinha, Adv. For the Vigilance : Mr. T.N. Verma, Adv. ---
06/22.01.2020 Heard Mr. Shekhar Prasad Sinha, learned counsel
appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
“For quashing of order framing charge dated 30.05.2018 passed by learned ADJ – IInd – cum – Spl. Judge (ACB), Dhanbad in connection with Spl. Vigilance Case No.70/2015 arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No.60 of 2015 dated 08.10.2015 for the offence u/s 7/13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of P.C. Act, 1988, pending in the court of learned ADJ – II nd – Spl. Judge (ACB), Dhanbad.”
2
connection with the number of notes and the denomination No. 2CP 172700 should be read as 3CP 172700.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Saurav/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court ought to exercise its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash the order framing charge.
Whether the typographical error in the seizure list regarding the number of notes warrants quashing of the charge.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tribhuwan Yadav
The State of Jharkhand through Vigilance
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
