Pratima Devi v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
In anticipatory bail application, petitioner seeks to withdraw the application. Permission to withdraw is granted and precedentent bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 3836 of 2020
Pratima Devi … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Karmarkar, Adv. For the State : Ms. Mohua Palit, Addl. P.P.
04 / 09.11.2020 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of the court to withdraw this application.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Pratima Devi
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
Coram
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- A.B.A./3836/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court