Allowed

Ramiya Marandi v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC9 Nov 2020A.B.A./3615/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a cheating case, allowing release upon deposit of interim victim compensation and furnishing a bail bond with sureties, while ignoring earlier defects due to the lawyer's undertaking.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted, to be released on deposit of Rs. 1,00,000 as interim victim compensation and bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

Ramiya Marandi Vs the State of Jharkhand — Cheating and Forgery | Jharkhand HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B. A. No. 3615 of 2020

¶2

Ramiya Marandi … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party

¶3

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶4

For the Petitioner : Mr. A. K. Sahani, Adv. For the State : Mr. V.K. Sinha, Addl. P.P.

¶5

04 / 09.11.2020 Heard the parties through Video Conferencing.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over.

¶7

In view of the personal undertaking given by learned counsel for the petitioner the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter are ignored for the present.

¶8

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Tisri P.S. case no. 06 of 2019 registered under Sections 420, 406, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the coaccused cheated the informant of Rs. 4,00,000/-. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and there is no allegation against the petitioner of any entrustment of money to him. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also ready and willing to pay Rs. 1,00,000/- as ad interim victim compensation to the informant without prejudice to his defence subject to final decision in the case, hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶10

The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶11

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner shall be released on

¶12

bail on depositing Rs. 1,00,000/- by way of demand draft drawn in favour of informant as ad interim victim compensation and furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., 1^st class, Giridih in connection with Tisri P.S. case no. 06 of 2019 subject to the condition that the petitioner will co- operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶13

In case of depositing aforesaid demand draft by the petitioner, learned court below is directed to issue notice to the informant and release the demand draft in his favour on proper identification forthwith .

¶14

( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)

¶15

Smita/-

Ramiya Marandi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramiya Marandi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Alias Amithh Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Hridaya Nand Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand

Onkar Mishra Vs the State of Jharkhand

Uday Gope Vs the State of Jharkhand

Pratima Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Tarique Hussain Alias MD Tarique Hussain Vs the State of Jharkhand