The High Court of Jharkhand granted the petitioner's permission to withdraw their anticipatory bail application and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application was accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 3158 of 2020
1.Kameshwar Prasad Gupta 2.Subhawati Devi ..… Petitioners
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Amrita Kumari
..... Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State : Mr. B.N. Jha, APP
02/ 09.09.2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties through V.C.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application.
3. Permission accorded.
4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Pramanik/
Kameshwar Prasad Gupta
Subhawati Devi
The State of Jharkhand
Amrita Kumari
DEEPAK ROSHAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
