HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.…
Permission to withdraw the application is accorded and the application is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 2767 of 2020
Jitendra Yadav @ Jitendra Kumar Yadav … ... Petitioner Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
-------For the Petitioner : Mr. B.K. Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. S.K. Burnwal, A.P.P.
Order No. 02: Dated: 5th November, 2020
Defects, as pointed out by the office, are ignored.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the
application since the petitioner has already been arrested.
Permission is accorded.
This application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
MM
Jitendra Yadav @ Jitendra Kumar Yadav
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
