Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the application. Court granted permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the application was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 2737 of 2020
Saheb Yadav --- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opposite Party ---
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY Through Video Conferencing
--For the Petitioner : Mr. Sabyasanchi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Naveen Kumar Ganjhu, A.P.P ---
Order No. 03 Dated 15th September, 2020
Defects, as pointed out by the office, are ignored.
Mr. Sabyasanchi, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Mr. Naveen Kumar Ganjhu, learned APP does not have any objection.
Permission is accorded.
This application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
(RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY,J.)
MK
Saheb Yadav
The State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
